"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. Back?" was an article that discussed the winners and losers after the recent ousting of President Hosni Mubarak formerly of Egypt. Groups such as: the people of Egypt, the Egyptian military, President Obama were praised for roles in letting the people of Egypt have their voice in their democracy. Other groups such as: the country of Israel, Al Quaeda, as well as other countries not allowing the people of their country a voice are closer to dissolving.
After reading the article I found the following to be interesting: 1. Honsni Mubarak was the Egyptian leader for the last 30 years. 2. The military currently runs Egypt during their transition of leadership. 3. Mubarak is thought to have stolen billions of dollars, and is currently being investigated. 4. The Egyptian people used "peaceful protest" to show their disagreement with former President Mubarak. 5. Many people / countries still do not live under a democracy (where the citizens have a voice in the decisions).
I enjoyed reading this article. I have heard a lot in the news about what was happening in Egypt, but was not sure what started it. From what I read, the people of Egypt were not happy with the job President Mubarak was doing, and it turns out he was possibly doing some illegal things. Mubarak eventually gave into the demands of the citizens of Egypt, and stepped down. The message to take from this article is to never give up in what you believe in. The people of Egypt want democracy, and their dreams are becoming a reality. I would recommend this article to anyone that has ever fought for anything they wanted, and would never give up.
"After Egypt, who should the U.S. back" The article is about winners and losers. Also Egypt. Also the president Hosni Mobarah stepped down from power. This article took place in egypt and in the U.S. Egypt rejoiced after the ouster of its 30 year strong man. President Hosni Mubarak stepped down form power. 30 years in power and 18 days of largely peaceful protest. Democracy could eventually blossom in Egypt. The article was very interesting. Also the article gave good info. The article was easy to understand. I think everybody should read this.
"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. Back?" was about the debate in Egypt. The people of Egypt wanted their president to step down. He was president for 30 years.
After reading the article this is what i learned: 1: Their president ruled for 30 years. 2: Protests means fighting for what you want to change. 3: Muslim is a religion 4: There is such thing as Muslim brotherhood
I didn't like this article. We already heard about it and I don't think we wanna know more. We should stay out of there business. I recommend this to adults.
"After Egypt, who should the US back?" was an article we read about the revolution in Egypt and the winners and losers as a result. Some winners include the protesters (duh) and Obama. Some losers include Mubarak (duh) and Israel.
Four facts I found in the article are: This whole thing is causing unease throughout all the middle east governments. Most of the protesting dissolved the parliament. Israel was damaged by the revolution in Egypt.
I thought this article was confusing. It talked of things I knew little about and used phrases I wasn't familiar with. If this article was for kids, I think it would be simplified. I would recommend this article to grown ups interested in Egyptian politics.
The title of this article is " After Egypt Who should the U.S back" This is taking place in Egypt and the U.S. This article is about Egypt's protest. And how Mubarak finally stepped down after 30 years. And how Egypt used the powerful of peace protest to get Mubarak to step down.
Four facts I learned are 1. The Egyptians use the "Power of peace protest" to get mubarak to step down. 2. Mubarak ruled for 30 years. 3. Egyptians wer critizing Obama. 4. That China's and Russia's leaders that a few men decide the foat for 1.3 million people.
My overall thoughts are I don't think Egyptians should be critizing other governments for reacting so late to Egypts problems. I think the governments make there own decisons. Egypt should solve there own problems. I reccommend this to everyone.
After Egypt who should the u.s back was the article i read this week. the author was not said. This article was about Egypt. Egypt finally got their way. now they don't have a president.
the 3 facts i learned were 1. what departure means 2. what reverberate means 3. why Egypt was fight about.
I did not like this article. I thought it was confusing in parts. This article kept on changing the topic.
"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. Back?" is an article taken place in Egypt and U.S. This article is about all the protesting about the president of Egypt into democracy.
Four facts i learned from this article is: 1. President Hoshi Mubarak stepped down on Friday after 30 years in power and 18 days of largely peaceful protesting 2. At least 3\4 of Egyptians favor imposing Sharia law, stoning adulterers and embracing Islamic fundamentalism 3. President Obama has been criticized for sending mixed messages and reacting slowly to events in Egypt 4. After 18 days of protesting the Egyptians finally got what they wanted
My overall thoughts on this article: I thought this article was boring. It didn't make sense. There was a ton of words I didn't know. I recommend this article to people who don't know a lot about this topic.
"After Egypt Who Should The U.S. Back" was an article by an unknown author. It was about how egypt's ruler stepped down after 30 years of ruling.
Here are four facts i learned 1.the ruler of egypt ruled for 30 years 2.there is no election for who rules in egypt 3.Democracy will eventually blossom in Egypt 4.Obama has been criticized for sending mixed messages or reading slowly.
I liked reqding this article. I think it told important facts about what is happening in Egypt and other countries around the world. I would recommend this article to adults.
"After Egypt, who should the U.S back" was about the winners and the losers of the protests talking about there thoughts on the protests. Barak obama is on the winning list.
there are a lot of interesting facts in the story but here are some that really stood out. 1.there president stepped down last friday. 2.three fourths of Egypt don't care for the sharia law 3.Egypts president served for 30 years 4.the protests took 18 days.
I thought that the article was interesting. Because we don't get to learn about this kind of stuff. But when we do its cool. I would recommend this piece to kids.
" After Egypt, Who should the U.S back" The article was about Egypt's government change. Their president stepped down for office. Now Egyptians are wondering who will be there next president.
Four facts I learned from the aritcle are. 1. President mubarak was in office for 3o years and 18 days. 2. Egypt holds elections that allow ardent Islanics vote. 3. Al quaeda is closer to the brink annibilation. 4. Egyptians proved exthimsts wrong.
The whole article was confusing. I was confused with the whole winners and losers. I don't pay attention to anything in the news. I reccommend this to adults.
"After Egypt who should the US back" was our article this week. It was about winners and losers after the egypt incident. FOr example the protestors were winners.
Four facts I learned are 1. Mubarak ruled for 30 years 2.Mubarak stepped down 3.The protesting was for 18 days 4.Egypts military is in power
I didnt like this article. I thought it was confusing. I don't know who Al Jazeera is, since the article wasn't very clear. I recommend this article to government officials.
The article "After Egypt Who Will The U.S. Back" was about how egypts ruler Hosni Mubarak just stepped out of office. Egypt doesn't know where to go next. Egypt had Mubarak step out of office by a series of peacful protests.
Four facts I learned while reading this article where: 1.Egypts Hosni Mubarak just stepped out of office. 2.The egyptians used peacful protests to show that they wanted Hosni Mubarak out of office. 3.Isreal is damaged from egypts revolution. 4.People where criticising Obama saying he did not act fast enough on this problem.
I thought this article was very confusing. I didn't understand all of the presedents and countries with paragraphs under it. I am happy that egypt used peacful protests but still got what they wanted. I would recommend this article to the government.
" After Egypt, Who Should The U.S. Back ?" is an article about Mubarak stepping down from power. Also for a good chunk of this article it mentioned people who are all nervous for this change in Egypt. This movement could be a very positive change for Egypt.
Here are three facts that I found in this article........... -Egypt has sent shock waves around the world motivating other countries to do the same. - Egyptians have protested for now eighteen days to get their message about changing their government. - After thirty years of being in power Mr. Hosni Mubarak finally stepped down after many protests.
I think that this is the right choice for the Egyptian Government to make. It is about time they get some new thoughts and opinions in there. Also just wondering when would have their next election would have been anyway and I think it would take place when the old president dies.
The name of this article was "After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. back?". This article talks about egypt. They talk about how Mubarak has finally stepped down. THey also talk about what came out on top in egypt and what didn't.
Four facts I learned from this article were: 1.President Mubarak was in office for 30 years and 18 days. 2.Egypt holds elections that allow ardent Islanics vote. 3.Al quaeda is closer to the brink annibilation. 4.Egyptions proved exthimists wrong.
I didn't like the article. I thought it was boring and confusing. I didn't understand what they were talking about and wasn't interested. I recommend this article to adults Egypt.
"After Egypt, Who should the U.S back" The article was about Egypt's protesting. It is also about how they got a new president. It also talked about the people that won and losed. This article took place in Egypt.
The four facts that i learnd are. 1.That Mubarak was thair president for 30 years. 2.That AL Jazeea is a TV show in the middle east. 3.That the protest lasted 18 days. 4.Mubarak stepped down last friday.
I did not like this article because I think it was bad that Egypt has a new president.The protestors handled it wrong. I also dont like this article because I think he should have stayed president because I think he was not realy wrong. I would reccomend this article to adults.
"After Egyt, Who Ahould the U.S Back?" is an article about the epidemic in Egypt. It exlianes that the other countries might be effected. i learned that this is a bigger problem thann i thought. This article takes place in Egypt.
Four facts that I learnd from the article are... 1. Placte means someone who does somthing to make someone happy. 2. This effects more than just Egypt. 3. I learnd that Mubarak wasn't a very good leader because he stoll from Egypt. 4. I learnd that cronies is like another term for gang.
I liked the article. It gave me a little more insite on what was happening in Egypt. Because of that new understanding I was able to understand Egypt's situation better. I would recommend the article to people who want to learn more about the problem in Egypt.
"After Egypt, who should the U.S. back" was the name of the article. The article talked about who won and who lost because of the protest. Also about what Mubarak has done to the country. The article took place in Egypt and in the U.S.
Four facts I learned were: 1. The Egyptian presidents name is Hosni Mubarak. 2. Mubarak ruled for 30 years. 3.The military helped out a lot with the protesters. 4. There were tons of protesters on each side.
I thought the article was boring. It didn't really pertain to me so it wasn't interesting. There wasn't many facts. I would recommend this to people in other countries who wan a new leader.
The article talks about the winners/losers of Egypt’s fight. Who should the U.S. backup. Also it had information about the winners or losers.
Four facts I’ve learned are the winners of Egypt’s fight. I learned the losers of Egypt’s fight. I learned why Egypt was fighting. I learned about the people who have a better chance at getting our support.
My thoughts are to back up the people who have a good point. Backup the people that have a good reason. Backup the people we want to help, who should be helped and who have the right and should backed up.
:After Egypt who should u.s back. by:non valid aouthher.My summary of this article was that this article was mainly about the crisis that happened in egypt people want to know who the u.s is gonna back but the united states shouldn't back anyone becausse it will cause even bigger problems in egypt and possibly even the united states. this article is taking place everywere besides the country's that are not involved in this situation. four facts i've learned from this article are... 1the egyptian presidant was in office for exactly 30 years and 18 days. 2egypts democracy could eventually blossom in the near future. 3the peacful protest was getting the egyptian govener out of office. 4i learned that al queda is on the brink os anniliation. My overall thought on this article are.... is that he govern ments that are already invloved in this crisis should really stay out because this crisis is about egypt and nothing else and if the U.S whould stay out of it there wouldn't even be this article. i would recomend this article to anyone i guess.
The article i read was called "after egypt, who should the U.S. back" it was about the egyption president, Hosni Mubarak stepping down after 30 years in power. It was also about how egypt might get democracy now that Mubarak stepped down.
Four facts that i learned from the article are... 1.I learned that egypt protested for Hosni to step down in peaceful ways. 2.I also learned that egypt is starting to transition into democracy. 3.President Hosni Mubarak stepped down on friday after 30 years in power. 4.Did you know that martial law is where the military takes over leadership of the country.
I wonder what will happen that will change us and egypt if they get democracy. I liked this article because it had good information on what is going on in egypt. I also liked this article because there is a title for each paragraph. I would recomend this article to people wh like to know what is going on in the world.
"After Egypt,Who Should the US Back?" was about who had good things happen to them after Egypt stopped protesting.Many gained power.Some lost power.It was all over. 4 facts I learned are: 1:Military is in charge. 2:Al Jezeera did more than US. 3:Obama sent mixed messages to Egypt. 4:Israel lost power. I thought the article was ok. It let me know how other countries are dealing w/ protests.It was boring at some parts but ok.I recommend this article to anyone.
"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S Back?" This article talks about a crisis in Egypt. The crisis is that the people in Egypt are wanting their president out of office. If you are interested in the crisis of Egypt, you should read this article. This article takes place worldwide.
Four facts I learned from this article are... 1. Fundamentalism means interpretation of every word. 2. Obama sent mixed messages to Egypt. 3. Reverberate is the ring or echo with sound. 4. Israel lost it's power.
I didn't really understand this article. But the part I did understand was that it talks about the crisis in Egypt. This article gave a lot of good facts. I would recommend this article to adults.
"After egypt,who should US back"was about how there is alot of problems in egypt.Since mubarak stepped down there were millions of dollars to be payed back. there were 18 days of rioting there is some peace.
four facts that i learned were: 1:mubarak was the president of egypt for 30 years 2:egyptians belive that violance solves stuff 3:the egyptians revoulotion damaged israel. 4:al jeezra did alot more than the US
I didn't like the article because I don't know enough about the topic to understand it.i also didn't like it because most of the words didn't make sense to me. I would recommend this article to anyone.
23 comments:
"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. Back?" was an article that discussed the winners and losers after the recent ousting of President Hosni Mubarak formerly of Egypt. Groups such as: the people of Egypt, the Egyptian military, President Obama were praised for roles in letting the people of Egypt have their voice in their democracy. Other groups such as: the country of Israel, Al Quaeda, as well as other countries not allowing the people of their country a voice are closer to dissolving.
After reading the article I found the following to be interesting:
1. Honsni Mubarak was the Egyptian leader for the last 30 years.
2. The military currently runs Egypt during their transition of leadership.
3. Mubarak is thought to have stolen billions of dollars, and is currently being investigated.
4. The Egyptian people used "peaceful protest" to show their disagreement with former President Mubarak.
5. Many people / countries still do not live under a democracy (where the citizens have a voice in the decisions).
I enjoyed reading this article. I have heard a lot in the news about what was happening in Egypt, but was not sure what started it. From what I read, the people of Egypt were not happy with the job President Mubarak was doing, and it turns out he was possibly doing some illegal things. Mubarak eventually gave into the demands of the citizens of Egypt, and stepped down. The message to take from this article is to never give up in what you believe in. The people of Egypt want democracy, and their dreams are becoming a reality. I would recommend this article to anyone that has ever fought for anything they wanted, and would never give up.
"After Egypt, who should the U.S. back"
The article is about winners and losers. Also Egypt. Also the president Hosni Mobarah stepped down from power. This article took place in egypt and in the U.S.
Egypt rejoiced after the ouster of its 30 year strong man. President Hosni Mubarak stepped down form power. 30 years in power and 18 days of largely peaceful protest. Democracy could eventually blossom in Egypt.
The article was very interesting. Also the article gave good info. The article was easy to understand. I think everybody should read this.
"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. Back?" was about the debate in Egypt. The people of Egypt wanted their president to step down. He was president for 30 years.
After reading the article this is what i learned:
1: Their president ruled for 30 years.
2: Protests means fighting for what you want to change.
3: Muslim is a religion
4: There is such thing as Muslim brotherhood
I didn't like this article. We already heard about it and I don't think we wanna know more. We should stay out of there business. I recommend this to adults.
"After Egypt, who should the US back?" was an article we read about the revolution in Egypt and the winners and losers as a result. Some winners include the protesters (duh) and Obama. Some losers include Mubarak (duh) and Israel.
Four facts I found in the article are: This whole thing is causing unease throughout all the middle east governments. Most of the protesting dissolved the parliament. Israel was damaged by the revolution in Egypt.
I thought this article was confusing. It talked of things I knew little about and used phrases I wasn't familiar with. If this article was for kids, I think it would be simplified. I would recommend this article to grown ups interested in Egyptian politics.
The title of this article is " After Egypt Who should the U.S back" This is taking place in Egypt and the U.S. This article is about Egypt's protest. And how Mubarak finally stepped down after 30 years. And how Egypt used the powerful of peace protest to get Mubarak to step down.
Four facts I learned are
1. The Egyptians use the "Power of peace protest" to get mubarak to step down.
2. Mubarak ruled for 30 years.
3. Egyptians wer critizing Obama.
4. That China's and Russia's leaders that a few men decide the foat for 1.3 million people.
My overall thoughts are I don't think Egyptians should be critizing other governments for reacting so late to Egypts problems. I think the governments make there own decisons. Egypt should solve there own problems. I reccommend this to everyone.
After Egypt who should the u.s back was the article i read this week. the author was not said. This article was about Egypt. Egypt finally got their way. now they don't have a president.
the 3 facts i learned were 1. what departure means 2. what reverberate means 3. why Egypt was fight about.
I did not like this article. I thought it was confusing in parts. This article kept on changing the topic.
"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. Back?" is an article taken place in Egypt and U.S. This article is about all the protesting about the president of Egypt into democracy.
Four facts i learned from this article is:
1. President Hoshi Mubarak stepped down on Friday after 30 years in power and 18 days of largely peaceful protesting
2. At least 3\4 of Egyptians favor imposing Sharia law, stoning adulterers and embracing Islamic fundamentalism
3. President Obama has been criticized for sending mixed messages and reacting slowly to events in Egypt
4. After 18 days of protesting the Egyptians finally got what they wanted
My overall thoughts on this article:
I thought this article was boring. It didn't make sense. There was a ton of words I didn't know. I recommend this article to people who don't know a lot about this topic.
"After Egypt Who Should The U.S. Back" was an article by an unknown author. It was about how egypt's ruler stepped down after 30 years of ruling.
Here are four facts i learned
1.the ruler of egypt ruled for 30 years
2.there is no election for who rules in egypt
3.Democracy will eventually blossom in Egypt
4.Obama has been criticized for sending mixed messages or reading slowly.
I liked reqding this article. I think it told important facts about what is happening in Egypt and other countries around the world. I would recommend this article to adults.
"After Egypt, who should the U.S back" was about the winners and the losers of the protests talking about there thoughts on the protests. Barak obama is on the winning list.
there are a lot of interesting facts in the story but here are some that really stood out.
1.there president stepped down last friday.
2.three fourths of Egypt don't care for the sharia law
3.Egypts president served for 30 years
4.the protests took 18 days.
I thought that the article was interesting. Because we don't get to learn about this kind of stuff. But when we do its cool. I would recommend this piece to kids.
" After Egypt, Who should the U.S back" The article was about Egypt's government change. Their president stepped down for office. Now Egyptians are wondering who will be there next president.
Four facts I learned from the aritcle are.
1. President mubarak was in office for 3o years and 18 days.
2. Egypt holds elections that allow ardent Islanics vote.
3. Al quaeda is closer to the brink annibilation.
4. Egyptians proved exthimsts wrong.
The whole article was confusing. I was confused with the whole winners and losers. I don't pay attention to anything in the news. I reccommend this to adults.
"After Egypt who should the US back" was our article this week. It was about winners and losers after the egypt incident. FOr example the protestors were winners.
Four facts I learned are
1. Mubarak ruled for 30 years
2.Mubarak stepped down
3.The protesting was for 18 days
4.Egypts military is in power
I didnt like this article. I thought it was confusing. I don't know who Al Jazeera is, since the article wasn't very clear. I recommend this article to government officials.
The article "After Egypt Who Will The U.S. Back" was about how egypts ruler Hosni Mubarak just stepped out of office. Egypt doesn't know where to go next. Egypt had Mubarak step out of office by a series of peacful protests.
Four facts I learned while reading this article where:
1.Egypts Hosni Mubarak just stepped out of office.
2.The egyptians used peacful protests to show that they wanted Hosni Mubarak out of office.
3.Isreal is damaged from egypts revolution.
4.People where criticising Obama saying he did not act fast enough on this problem.
I thought this article was very confusing. I didn't understand all of the presedents and countries with paragraphs under it. I am happy that egypt used peacful protests but still got what they wanted. I would recommend this article to the government.
" After Egypt, Who Should The U.S. Back ?" is an article about Mubarak stepping down from power. Also for a good chunk of this article it mentioned people who are all nervous for this change in Egypt. This movement could be a very positive change for Egypt.
Here are three facts that I found in this article...........
-Egypt has sent shock waves around the world motivating other countries to do the same.
- Egyptians have protested for now eighteen days to get their message about changing their government.
- After thirty years of being in power Mr. Hosni Mubarak finally stepped down after many protests.
I think that this is the right choice for the Egyptian Government to make. It is about time they get some new thoughts and opinions in there. Also just wondering when would have their next election would have been anyway and I think it would take place when the old president dies.
The name of this article was "After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. back?". This article talks about egypt. They talk about how Mubarak has finally stepped down. THey also talk about what came out on top in egypt and what didn't.
Four facts I learned from this article were:
1.President Mubarak was in office for 30 years and 18 days.
2.Egypt holds elections that allow ardent Islanics vote.
3.Al quaeda is closer to the brink annibilation.
4.Egyptions proved exthimists wrong.
I didn't like the article. I thought it was boring and confusing. I didn't understand what they were talking about and wasn't interested. I recommend this article to adults Egypt.
"After Egypt, Who should the U.S back" The article was about Egypt's protesting. It is also about how they got a new president. It also talked about the people that won and losed. This article took place in Egypt.
The four facts that i learnd are.
1.That Mubarak was thair president for 30 years.
2.That AL Jazeea is a TV show in the middle east.
3.That the protest lasted 18 days.
4.Mubarak stepped down last friday.
I did not like this article because I think it was bad that Egypt has a new president.The protestors handled it wrong. I also dont like this article because I think he should have stayed president because I think he was not realy wrong. I would reccomend this article to adults.
"After Egyt, Who Ahould the U.S Back?" is an article about the epidemic in Egypt. It exlianes that the other countries might be effected. i learned that this is a bigger problem thann i thought. This article takes place in Egypt.
Four facts that I learnd from the article are...
1. Placte means someone who does somthing to make someone happy.
2. This effects more than just Egypt.
3. I learnd that Mubarak wasn't a very good leader because he stoll from Egypt.
4. I learnd that cronies is like another term for gang.
I liked the article. It gave me a little more insite on what was happening in Egypt. Because of that new understanding I was able to understand Egypt's situation better. I would recommend the article to people who want to learn more about the problem in Egypt.
"After Egypt, who should the U.S. back" was the name of the article. The article talked about who won and who lost because of the protest. Also about what Mubarak has done to the country. The article took place in Egypt and in the U.S.
Four facts I learned were:
1. The Egyptian presidents name is Hosni Mubarak.
2. Mubarak ruled for 30 years.
3.The military helped out a lot with the protesters.
4. There were tons of protesters on each side.
I thought the article was boring. It didn't really pertain to me so it wasn't interesting. There wasn't many facts. I would recommend this to people in other countries who wan a new leader.
After Egypt, Who Should the U.S. Back?
The article talks about the winners/losers of Egypt’s fight. Who should the U.S. backup. Also it had information about the winners or losers.
Four facts I’ve learned are the winners of Egypt’s fight. I learned the losers of Egypt’s fight. I learned why Egypt was fighting. I learned about the people who have a better chance at getting our support.
My thoughts are to back up the people who have a good point. Backup the people that have a good reason. Backup the people we want to help, who should be helped and who have the right and should backed up.
:After Egypt who should u.s back. by:non valid aouthher.My summary of this article was that this article was mainly about the crisis that happened in egypt people want to know who the u.s is gonna back but the united states shouldn't back anyone becausse it will cause even bigger problems in egypt and possibly even the united states. this article is taking place everywere besides the country's that are not involved in this situation.
four facts i've learned from this article are...
1the egyptian presidant was in office for exactly 30 years and 18 days.
2egypts democracy could eventually blossom in the near future.
3the peacful protest was getting the egyptian govener out of office.
4i learned that al queda is on the brink os anniliation.
My overall thought on this article are....
is that he govern ments that are already invloved in this crisis should really stay out because this crisis is about egypt and nothing else and if the U.S whould stay out of it there wouldn't even be this article. i would recomend this article to anyone i guess.
The article i read was called "after egypt, who should the U.S. back" it was about the egyption president, Hosni Mubarak stepping down after 30 years in power. It was also about how egypt might get democracy now that Mubarak stepped down.
Four facts that i learned from the article are...
1.I learned that egypt protested for Hosni to step down in peaceful ways.
2.I also learned that egypt is starting to transition into democracy.
3.President Hosni Mubarak stepped down on friday after 30 years in power.
4.Did you know that martial law is where the military takes over leadership of the country.
I wonder what will happen that will change us and egypt if they get democracy. I liked this article because it had good information on what is going on in egypt. I also liked this article because there is a title for each paragraph. I would recomend this article to people wh like to know what is going on in the world.
"After Egypt,Who Should the US Back?" was about who had good things happen to them after Egypt stopped protesting.Many gained power.Some lost power.It was all over.
4 facts I learned are:
1:Military is in charge.
2:Al Jezeera did more than US.
3:Obama sent mixed messages to Egypt.
4:Israel lost power.
I thought the article was ok. It let me know how other countries are dealing w/ protests.It was boring at some parts but ok.I recommend this article to anyone.
"After Egypt, Who Should the U.S Back?" This article talks about a crisis in Egypt. The crisis is that the people in Egypt are wanting their president out of office. If you are interested in the crisis of Egypt, you should read this article. This article takes place worldwide.
Four facts I learned from this article are...
1. Fundamentalism means interpretation of every word.
2. Obama sent mixed messages to Egypt.
3. Reverberate is the ring or echo with sound.
4. Israel lost it's power.
I didn't really understand this article. But the part I did understand was that it talks about the crisis in Egypt. This article gave a lot of good facts. I would recommend this article to adults.
"After egypt,who should US back"was about how there is alot of problems in egypt.Since mubarak stepped down there were millions of dollars to be payed back. there were 18 days of rioting there is some peace.
four facts that i learned were:
1:mubarak was the president of egypt for 30 years
2:egyptians belive that violance solves stuff
3:the egyptians revoulotion damaged israel.
4:al jeezra did alot more than the US
I didn't like the article because I don't know enough about the topic to understand it.i also didn't like it because most of the words didn't make sense to me.
I would recommend this article to anyone.
Post a Comment